🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K votes into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible where yesterday went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump last year went for the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added all of these conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I think occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. However no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed major surprises on this one, but he did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I think that each urban center in the US can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.